This holiday season feels like a tale of two shoppers. Consumer sentiment is near multi-decade lows, with the University of Michigan index hovering around levels historically associated with recession. At the same time, American household savings have been buoyed by a historic rebound in the stock market. A rally fueled by AI optimism and resilient corporate earnings has pushed markets higher while tariff concerns seem to have evaporated almost as quickly as they first surfaced. This widening gap between the financial health of America’s earning class and the buying power of market participants is becoming one of the defining narratives of the decade.

The driving force behind consumer sentiment is wage growth. Real wage growth for top earners continues to outpace inflation, but at the same time, lower-income households, still digesting the whiplash of the pandemic economy, have watched their wage gains stagnate or disappear entirely. Not having wage growth to fall back on when real, everyday inflation hasn’t gone away can have profound implications on spending habits for most Americans.

Note, inflation hits everyone differently. Every household has its own basket of goods, its own definition of “expensive,” and its own pain points. Recent earnings and consumer insights from retailers show almost everyone is looking for a deal. Strong stock market returns can bolster retirees’ spending habits, but for the majority of working Americans, this holiday season will likely center solely around finding the best deal in town.

Are Tariffs Impacting Shoppers?

After dominating headlines earlier this year, tariffs seemed to have faded from public consciousness. Markets corrected in dramatic fashion following Liberation Day in April as investors tried to interpret the ripple effects of escalating levies on supply chains, consumer goods, and import costs. But as markets rebounded and AI-driven optimism took over, tariffs gradually drifted out of the spotlight, even though their impact hasn’t completely disappeared.

Part of the reason consumers don’t feel tariff-driven inflation is because of where those costs actually land. Much of the tariff pressure shows up in categories like personal electronics, appliances, and durable household goods – items that carry slower replacement cycles and more flexible margins across the supply chain. In many cases, suppliers and manufacturers have absorbed a majority of the hit to stay competitive, leaving prices at the counter or online relatively unchanged. Furthermore, when it comes to CPI, the highest tariff exposure sits in the goods categories that make up a smaller share of the average household budget. Even when higher input costs eventually make their way to consumers here, the impact on the overall “inflation rate” that gets reported in the data should be pretty minimal.

However, that doesn’t mean that Americans won’t feel inflation. They feel it every day because right now a lot of the items with perceived rising prices are items that are really visible, tied in to everyday living. Food, energy, and shelter are the three CPI baskets that tend to really matter for consumers and any moves here really attract attention. These items account for a disproportionate share of monthly spending, especially for lower- and middle-income households. A 3% rise in groceries hits harder than a 10% rise in laptop prices simply because families buy milk and eggs every week, not MacBooks. Additionally, costs like rent, the mortgage, or insurance also tend to dominate budgets, so even small moves there can start to crowd out discretionary spending.

There is a psychological aspect to inflation as well. Price increases for some grocery items can be particularly jarring. A 25%increase in high visibility items like coffee or beef stands out and makes people reevaluate their shopping patterns even if the overall grocery bill may only be up a few percentage points.

The recent decision from the Trump administration to roll back tariffs on beef and coffee imports from Latin America is encouraging. Cheaper protein and cheaper caffeine may not solve inflation, but they do ease pressure on households that remain sensitive to grocery prices. More importantly, the reversal is a quiet acknowledgement of a long-standing economic truth – tariffs are inflationary by design, and consumers ultimately face the consequences in the long-run. The efficacy of tariffs at reducing our budget deficit can be debated, but general consensus on Capitol Hill is that American shoppers need some price relief.

Shopping for Deals

The evolution of the K-shaped economy has been on full display in 2025. Walmart’s recent earnings captured the dynamic better than anything else. Strong demand for fast shipping, online convenience, and private-label value pushed the stock sharply higher. Yet the real story was how much market share Walmart has gained across all income brackets. Wealthier households are trading down, middle-income households are stretching their budgets, and lower-income households are making uncomfortable substitutions. Everyone is hunting for a deal.

Consumers are no longer loyal to brands – they’re loyal to prices, and retailers know it. Even high-income shoppers, who historically gravitated toward premium labels, are gravitating toward generic-labelled essentials and groceries. Buy-now-pay-later usage is also climbing across income tiers and expected to reach over $20 billion worth of transactions in November and December, increasing 10% from 2024. Technology is changing the playing field too – holiday shopping searches will likely be heavily AI-assisted this year, making it easier to find a good deal and compare prices quickly. AI utilization is also going to reward digitally focused marketplaces. The ones that are not only competing on price, but who understand how AI is going to interact with their pages, those companies are likely set to receive more attention than ever before.

Retailers are also pulling forward discounts earlier into the season. Getting ahead of Black Friday deals gave big corporations a chance to compete against resale marketplaces like eBay (EBAY) and Poshmark, especially as more consumers are willing to buy secondhand, premium-branded clothing and gifts.

With retailers leaning into early discounts, they have also acknowledged the current state of the consumer through their store layouts and holiday inventory. Costco, for example, is accommodating the slowdown in discretionary spending by stocking up on seasonal basics like winter apparel, holiday meal prep, and paper products while still leaving some room for top-end luxury items like saunas and furniture for those unaffected by inflation. The unnecessary holiday décor likely won’t get as much shelf space this year. Simply said, there is no more middle ground. It’s deal or no deal now.

Technology Heating Up Shopping Competition

One of the most underappreciated shifts in the economy is the transformation of retailers into technology companies. Walmart (WMT), Target (TGT), and Costco (COST) are no longer defined solely by their physical stores. They are becoming full-stack platforms built on logistics networks, data infrastructure, and AI-driven personalization that rival the capabilities of traditional tech firms. Walmart, for example, will begin listing its stock on the more tech-focused Nasdaq exchange in December. Goodbye old-school retail, and hello AI integrated retail.

While it’s becoming evident for retailers, this theme can easily be applied across the U.S. economy more broadly – we live in a world where big companies with integrated technology stacks are able to leverage size and scale in a way that puts small companies at a serious disadvantage. Consumers often protest the domination of corporate entities over the small business – it’s a popular political refrain. But spending habits aren’t exactly aligned. Every time consumers restock laundry detergent through the Amazon (AMZN) app, they’re directly contributing to the dominance of big corporates!

The forces pushing retailers in this direction are straightforward. In the midst of elevated inflation, consumer spending has shifted toward groceries and essential goods, leaving retailers with little room for error when it comes to margins. To expand profitability, companies are turning to technology and data monetization as key growth engines. At the same time, consumer expectations have changed. Shoppers now demand same-day delivery, seamless returns, near-perfect order accuracy, and tailored recommendations – all of which require sophisticated technology behind the scenes.

Tariffs and supply chain volatility add another layer of complexity. Incorrectly forecasting inventory has never been more expensive, pushing retailers to rely on AI to determine what to stock, where to place it, and how to price it. In many ways, the retailers best positioned for the next decade are those that behave less like merchants and more like technology companies with powerful logistics capabilities. The winners will be the firms that use data to create a loyal following of consumers seeking protection from the seemingly ever-increasing cost of living in America.

Checking Out

This holiday shopping season is shedding light on America’s K-shaped economy. While wealthier households enjoy rising asset values and stronger wage growth, lower- and middle-income consumers continue to feel the pinch of everyday inflation. But across income brackets, the hunt for deals has become the defining theme. Retailers have responded by leaning into technology, logistics, and data-driven personalization to meet these evolving demands and protect margins. Tariffs and pricing pressures remain in the background, quietly influencing both what ends up on shelves and what consumers can afford. Americans are still going to shop this holiday season, but more cautiously and price-sensitive than ever before.

Why American Housing Markets Have Stalled 

The U.S. housing market is currently in a paradoxical state. On one hand, there’s a significant demand backlog driven by millions of Americans in need of homes and decades of underbuilding. On the other hand, the usual mechanisms that convert this demand into actual home closings are stalled. Home sales are currently the lowest they’ve been in over 30 years! Mortgage rates have yet to come down meaningfully for it to make sense for homeowners to truly consider a move and the construction labor market has seen better days as it grapples with a low supply of workers and a surge in input costs. The affordability of the white picket fence is increasingly being criticized by young professionals, meaning the rental market is not just for Americans on the move. For prospective homebuyers, homebuilders, and investors this creates a landscape that appears ripe with opportunity but demands caution in practice. 

Interest Rates Impact Housing Affordability 

Mortgage rates remain one of the most pivotal factors in housing affordability. Following the ultra-low rates of the post-pandemic era, the market has shifted to higher levels, though they’ve eased slightly recently. According to Freddie Mac data, the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate stood at 6.27% as of mid-October 2025. 

A decade of near-zero interest rates after the Great Financial Crisis had allowed developers and investors to leverage extensively for favorable cap rates. Nonetheless, new starts didn’t necessarily surge relative to the broader reappearance in aggregate demand. More regulatory hurdles and financial constraints also made it hard for homebuilders to take advantage of the near zero rates. 

Fast forward a few years and interest rates again throw a wrench in the system; after low Covid era interest rates initially stoked demand, the rapid rate hikes in 2022 crushed affordability and created a lot of grid lock in the housing system. Newly high rates discouraged sellers from listing their homes as a comparable refinance rate was so much higher. So housing supply dropped. At the same time, higher rates have made purchasing a house more expensive – so demand is down too. 

The recent decline in rates should be supportive for the housing market, at least on the surface. This is visible with builder sentiment rising to its highest level in six months. Yet, the degree to which rates have dropped may not be substantial enough. Many homeowners secured sub-4% rates during the pandemic and are reluctant to move and refinance just because of an extra 25 basis point reduction in mortgage rates. 

Absent sellers coming into the market and new supply coming online, lowering rates could just serve to push home prices even higher as buyers potentially come back into the market. Moreover, affordability must be viewed holistically: while current rates aren’t historically extreme, persistent inflation is curbing discretionary spending, making mortgage payments more burdensome for American consumers. 

Why Is Building New Homes So Expensive? 

The homebuilding industry faces persistent structural challenges that hinder supply growth. Top of mind currently is a shortage of skilled construction labor. A joint study by the Home Builders Institute (HBI) and the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) estimates that this labor shortage cost the single-family sector over $8 billion in lost production in 2024 alone, while delaying construction times by an average of almost 2 months. Even more notably is that immigrant labor constitutes a significant portion of the construction workforce. Large-scale deportations can exacerbate already existing shortages, leading to sharp increases in labor costs. Removing thousands of workers can slow construction projects and reduce output by millions of jobs – affecting both immigrants and U.S.-born workers while driving up home prices. 

Additionally, land use regulations continue to make homebuilding more burdensome. And this isn’t a national problem – it’s a local problem which makes it even harder to address at scale. This is likely not talked about enough – when we struggle to create new homes for people to live in, an entire generation of workers can become priced out of new job opportunities and innovation can stall. Ample housing is necessary to enable relocation in our country and eliminate frictions for our workforce to move about freely. 

However, this is easier said than done. NIMBY (“Not In My Backyard”) forces actively resist efforts to make housing more affordable, driven by one fundamental motivation: scarcity. Homeowners know that the value of their property depends largely on the supply of homes in their neighborhood. While zoning reform sounds promising, it is a complex challenge that is likely to persist for many years. 

And we can’t forget about inflation. Homebuilders face rising input costs like lumber, concrete, and steel, and it doesn’t help that the current administration has placed tariffs on goods coming from our next-door neighbors like Canada and Mexico. The vast majority of U.S. lumber imports come from Canada, while Mexico is a leading exporter of lime and gypsum products used in drywall manufacturing. Homebuyers, on the other hand, have to deal with soaring homeowners’ insurance premiums, which have surged nearly 70% since 2019. These rising insurance costs inflate total housing carrying expenses, erode affordability, and can even depress home values in disaster-prone areas like Florida and California. 

The overall impact: even as mortgage rates dip, other under-the-radar costs continue to rise, tightening buyer budgets. Combined with homebuilders’ input and labor cost burdens, potential homebuyers are in a tough spot right now. 

Baby Boomers Impact The Housing Market Too 

Baby boomers dominate the housing market, owning approximately 40% of residential real estate. As a result, the U.S. housing stock is now skewed toward larger homes – a result of homebuilders catering to older folks upgrading houses throughout their life. Today, however, demand has shifted toward smaller starter homes like 2-bed/2-bath units favored by Gen Z renters transitioning to ownership. This mismatch is extremely important because it tests the theory that houses will become more affordable once baby boomer’s pass their homes off to the next generation of buyers – what if nobody wants those homes? This is where renovation will have to come into play to address the wrong kind of supply coming to market. The retail giants like Home Depot (HD) and Lowe’s (LOW) will continue to enable renovations and additions like smart home technology, insulation upgrades and kitchen tear downs and are poised to maintain their stronghold on the home improvement market. 

Worth considering is that baby boomers’ grip on supply in the U.S. will be compounded by advances in medical tech and AI-assisted home systems. The availability of human capital to serve this generation will also be critical. Staffing firms providing in-home skilled nursing, paired with AI, are likely to make staying in your home as you age more practical. This is paired with the fact that nursing home costs are becoming increasingly unaffordable – abundant demand for rooms paired with lack of supply is making access to high quality nursing homes expensive. Enabling our country’s senior citizens to “age-in-place” is a huge market for Big Tech firms like Apple (AAPL) – wearable tech and assistive access within their iOS has only served to make their lives easier and has plenty of runway to continue to scale. 

Hard to Argue Against Renting 

With homeownership increasingly unattainable for younger generations, renting has become the new norm. The old school American dream of buying a house after graduating college and starting a job is increasingly out of reach for younger workers. Delaying the first home purchase until after age 30 is not at all uncommon – meaning the renters market is more important than ever. When interest, taxes, insurance, and maintenance are all taken into account, owning is generally more expensive and time consuming than renting. Additionally, the opportunity cost from putting a down payment on a house can’t be ignored. For generations prioritizing their time and spending more on experiences, the homeownership lifestyle is becoming more out of style. 

This trend benefits consumer discretionary firms tailoring products to renters. Interior design services offering non-permanent customizations are in high demand. Stocks poised to benefit include furniture and home goods retailers like Wayfair (W), which offers affordable décor for temporary lifestyles. Additionally, rent-to-own specialists like Upbound Group (UPBD) could see upside as budget-conscious renters furnish without large upfront costs. These companies capitalize on renters’ habits of prioritizing flexible, value-driven purchases over permanent investments. 

Another point of contention with the renting vs. owning debate has been private equity behemoths becoming more involved in the residential market. Wall Street buying up Main Street has been criticized extensively by Capitol Hill, but the share of single-family homes owned by companies like Blackstone (BX) is still relatively small. And while many might point to Wall Street as the main culprit for making suburban homes unaffordable, there are real benefits to offering homes for rent v. purchase. Enabling lower income families to rent in the suburbs gives their children better access to high quality schools and quality of life – key factors in determining future financial health and college graduation rates. 

Wrapping It Up 

Structurally, the U.S. housing market is undersupplied, and demographics point to long-term tailwinds for the sector. But higher borrowing costs, ownership burdens, and industry bottlenecks paint a cautious picture for prospective homebuyers. Investment potential endures, but it will demand discipline: the current landscape does not lend itself to the traditional path of becoming a homeowner anymore. Until supply sorts itself out, look for opportunities within America’s renting cohort and enabling technology. The story of housing being unaffordable in America did not happen overnight, and it will probably take years to fix.